How Dirty Electricity is created?
One of the most dangerous types of EMF pollution is so-called “Dirty Electricity”. This is when the electrical power lines and wiring within your home contain frequencies other than the normal 60 Hz electrical current (50 Hz in Europe). These additional frequencies piggyback on the electrical wiring and radiate into your living environment.– Greewave Filter
Many modern devices no longer use standard AC electricity “as is.” Instead, they “manipulate” electrical current in one way or another in order to operate.
For example, many electrical devices today must convert standard 50/60-Hertz AC electricity (alternating current) into other forms of electricity — such as low voltage direct current (DC) or higher frequency AC — in order to operate. And many devices now draw power from wiring intermittently, in short burst, rather than continuously. They do this by turning the flow of power to a device “on” and “off” repeatedly, often thousands of times per second. These processes interrupt the smooth flow of standard 50/60-Hertz AC electricity, which creates harmonics and erratic surges and spikes of electrical energy (i.e., voltage transients).
Once created, this unusable dirty electricity spreads throughout a building and even to other buildings via wiring and power lines. As it travels, it radiates potentially harmful electromagnetic fields (EMF) into living and work environments.
Benefits of Clean Electricity
- Doesn’t emit carbon dioxide (CO2), mercury, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2) or particulate matter into the air, water or soil; commonly cited effects of these harmful pollutants include climate change, mercury poisoning, smog, acid rain and respiratory disease.
- Doesn’t damage the land like fossil-fuel extraction
- Is made from unlimited renewable sources
- Many forms of renewable energy use little to no water
- Helps preserve and protect the environment for future generations
- Creates employment opportunities in the green job sector in the U.S.; in 2011, job creation in clean energy outpaced fossil fuels by a margin of 3-to-11
- Supports a homegrown energy source, helping secure America’s energy future
- Brings development to rural areas, where renewable facilities are often sited to take advantage of ample space and resource potential
- Ahlbom A., and Feychting M. Electromagnetic radiation. Br Med Bull 2003: 68: 157–165.Article Google Scholar
- Ahlbom A., Green A., Kheifets L., Savitz D., and Swerdlow A. Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112 (17): 1741–1754.Article Google Scholar
- Aldrich T.E., and Easterly C.E. Electromagnetic fields and public health. Environ Health Perspect 1987: 75: 159–171.CAS Article Google Scholar
- Bauer J., Stamm A., Virnich K., Wissing K., Muller U., Wirsching M., and Schaarschmidt U. Correlation between burnout syndrome and psychological and psychosomatic symptoms among teachers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006: 79 (3): 199–204.Article Google Scholar
- Binhi V.N., and Savin A.V. Molecular gyroscopes and biological effects of weak extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 2002: 65 (5 Part 1): 051912.CAS Article Google Scholar
- BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) Online. 2009 May (cited 2009 August 6). Available from : http://www.bioinitiative.org/.
- Breckenkamp J., Neitzke H.P., Bornkessel C., and Berg-Beckhoff G. Applicability of an exposure model for the determination of emissions from mobile phone base stations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008: 131 (4): 474–481.